I think there is something terribly wrong with Joseph
Nkasa in trying to demonstrate that he is making enviable effort to increase
whatever windfalls that happens whenever he sings praise songs for the ruling
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) or the President, Peter Mutharika.
My take is that when one decides to play puppetry for
whatever reasons there should be a restraint not to go in whole hog. Or if one
decides to jump in nonetheless it is better to avoid stepping on a few fingers
along the way.
But in his latest toils, Nkasa has decided to pinch a
tune or a chorus from a Catholic Church hymn song 'Tinene Zaiye'. However where the church song mentions Jesus, Nkasa
has replaced him with Peter Mutharika.
Depending on one's religious standing, others might
feel offended while others will take it on the chin for various reasons.
This is however a tendency of DPP zealots when they
are drunk with power.
In 2012 when Peter Mutharika, at that time Foreign
Affairs and International Cooperation Minister, was burying his elder brother
Bingu wa Mutharika at Ndata Farm, just as he took to the podium to speak on
behalf of the bereaved family, the DPP Youth Cadets started singing: "Tiyeni tinene za Bingu ngakhale ena
sanena, tiyeni tinene za Bingu". They ruffled some devout feathers at
the time.
Now Nkasa has decided to even put it in a recorded
form in the hope that it will equally have a rallying influence as was the case
with 'Mose wa Lero'. He now sings
"Tinene za Peter ngakhale ena
sanena, tiyeni tinene za Peter".
Which brings me to his adaptation of anything
religious to create his political praise songs.
Nkasa hovers above politicians like a vulture waiting to pounce
on a carcass. He showed exactly this tendency when composed a song for former
minister of agriculture, irrigation and water development George Chaponda to
douse fires that eventually burnt his political career to the ground.
In the song Nkasa equates Chaponda to Joseph, one of the 12 sons
of the Biblical Jacob who became a ruler in Egypt after being sold there by his
brothers due to his closeness to their father.
Like I said before Nkasa
is always on the lookout for any political developments to jump on the
perceived opportunity and compose a song. Before his latest which is full
spewing vitriol towards Vice President Saulos Chilima, it looks like a sequel
whose prelude was a track he called Absalom.
I know that past between 20 and 25 years, copyright
issues over artistic works stop to matter. But if laws are made to take care
about this it can still matter.
There is an interesting write-up jointly produced by The
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and Australasian Mechanical
Copyright Owners Society (AMCOS).
It is titled the 'Music Copyright Guide for Churches: A practical copyright guide to
using music to its full potential'
Right from its introduction the write-up acknowledges that
'just like other organisations that use music, churches need to be aware of
their copyright obligations'.
It then further stare that 'there are a number of licences
and processes they need to explore to ensure that their music use both in
services of worship and other church-related activities are covered'.
This is the only way to stop any would be abuse to the kind
of work, like music belonging to the churches.
Career wise, I have discussed the pitfalls that lay
on the way of someone who still thinks has some remnants in his musical
professional if they decided to become political puppets. But Nkasa has wholly
taken the road that only shows he has stopped caring.
No comments:
Post a Comment